I've written about this before a few years ago, and have been researching it on and off ever since, because quite frankly, there are some things that
What's worse, I keep hitting walls in my research. So I'll just throw the question out there – again.
The LisaLise TheoryI believe science might very well have gotten some of it wrong when they were testing essential oils for possible allergens.
You Dare to Question Science, Lise?!Yes, I dare to question science. I question science because I am not fully convinced it took everything into account while it went about doing what was doing.
I question science because of things that continue to not add up.
Why does this matter?
Because some of science's test results became the basis from which policy-makers made their decisions, rules, policies and laws.
If science did happen to get it wrong, then there are findings that need to be re-examined and tests that need to be redone.
Possible AllergensLet's take a brief look at some ingredients – in particular the ones on the European "list of 26 possible allergens in cosmetics ingredients that must by law be declared on every cosmetics label".
Many of these possible allergens are components of essential oils, for example:
- benzyl alcohol
What Doesn't Add UpFor years, I've pondered why a person such as myself (who reacts very strongly to synthetic perfumes: itchiness, rash, headaches etc) never experiences any such reaction when exposed to the numerous 'possible allergens' present in essential oils?
You: You're an oddball, Lise. Probably the only person on the planet to react like that.
Several members of my family react the same. Many of my clients react the same. Friends, acquaintances, people I meet at dinner parties, events, lectures, etc react the same. Although I've never conducted an actual survey, over the years I've both met and learned of many people who react strongly to synthetic perfume but not essential oils.
I have a theory about that: I suspect lab testing equipment is the culprit.
Essential Oils and Plastics Mix - For RealWhile it is common knowledge to people who work extensively with essential oils that essential oils will react with plastic, I'm not entirely convinced science was aware of that bit of information as they performed their tests on essential oils.
Let's take a look at lab equipment. Test trays and tubes can be made made of any of the following
- PETG (Polyethylene terephtalate)
Every one of these materials are plastics.
Polystyrene, for example, is safe for use in food products, but is not recyclable. Described as 'generally non-biodegradable' and 'considered an environmental issue', polystyrene is resistant to acids and bases but is easily dissolved by many hydrocarbon solvents and organic solvents which dissolve the polymer.
See where I'm going with this?
You: Don't think you're so smart, Lise. They probably didn't even use plastic test tubes. They probably used petri dishes made of borosilicate glass.
I had that thought too, so I researched petri dishes.
I have not been able to find any petri dishes in borosilicate glass or even 'just' glass. Petri dishes are all made of polystyrene these days.
Which brings me to the next question: when did it become 'these days'?
These Days vs Test DaysIt would appear most lab testing equipment is produced in China 'these days' and it has been impossible for me to find out what came before. What were petri dishes or test tubes made of when the original tests on essential oils were conducted?
You tell me. I can't find any info on this.
I can't even find information on when were the original tests were conducted.
It could have been as far back as 1920.
Maybe it was only a few years ago.
But even if it was a mere 5 years ago, there doesn't seem to be any information on lab equipment available. Apparently, the history of lab testing equipment doesn't have anyones interest. There is no website, no museum, no lab-test-equipment-lovers-club anywhere.
If you happen to have a link or info, please do leave a comment!
Until Science Speaks Up...I cannot help but wonder if science may have made a big fat boo-boo when they tested essential oils by placing them in plastic equipment and thereby getting tainted results.
If that is indeed the case, then essential oil components might not even belong on the list of 26 possible allergens.
So, I ask again: Science, are you 100% sure about those test results?
Do TellDo you have a reaction to synthetic perfumes but not to essential oils? Please share!
LinksProduction Process Contamination of Citrus Essential Oils by Plastic Materials
Polystyrene degradation along coastlines of northeast Pacific Ocean
Difference between PET and PET-G
Polyethylene Terephalate May Yield Endocrine Disruptors
PET Resin Association
Study on Leaching of phtalates from polyethylene terephlate bottles into mineral water
Borosilicate Glass (wikipedia)
Kids Science Fun: Watch citrus essential oils eat through styrofoam
USP Class Explained
SCCS Final Opinion on Fragrance Allergens in Cosmetics Products available (2012)
Health and Consumer Scientific Committee list of 26 components
Aromatherapy Science - a Guide for Healthcare Professionals - Chapter 7 safety issues
Constituents of Essential Oils - AromaWeb
Essential Oils and Endocrine Disruptors
Previous Related Posts on This Subject
26 reasons these fruits may cause allergies
Essential Oils and Plastic